It has been hotter than heck lately, by anyone’s standards, I think. With the heat index well over 100, plenty of heat advisories were posted on weather websites. In my heart of hearts, I know this is the new weather pattern for Maine in July, and I have to accept it. But how I long for the old days, when the temperature in July seldom went above 80°F, and the humidity didn’t sap the energy from humans and animals alike. Those days are never coming back, and I feel sorry for the young people who will never experience the glory of a Maine July before the climate crisis hit.
I can only be thankful, then, that we have heat pumps, which not only keep our home pleasantly cool but also act as dehumidifiers. No more clogged salt shakers! Unfortunately, the creatures in the woods do not have this advantage, and I feel so sorry for them. Our dependence on fossil fuels has cast a wide, destructive net that ensnares the innocent.
But, a bit of good news. The flowers seem to enjoy the high heat and humidity, and the evening primroses are now in glorious bloom. There is yellow mixed in amongst the green, and for a while, there was even a splash of orange.
We have had different friends over on two separate occasions, and despite the heat, we spent time in the gazebo. (In late afternoon, when the sun no longer shone in our backyard.)
‘Tis one of our favorite places to be, and although I have featured this picture in a previous post, I thought I’d include it again because the lights are so lovely.
We had planned to serve grilled bread, but a little rodent chewed through the gas line on the grill, and Clif wasn’t able to fix it before our friends came over. Next time, there will be grilled bread.
Along with the heat, July in Maine brings the Maine International Film Festival (MIFF), a ten-day extravaganza of movies, many of them foreign. We have full festival passes and are looking forward to seeing movies we might never have heard of if it weren’t for MIFF. Accordingly, I will be taking a blogging break from July 10 to July 20 or so. I’ll keep track of all the movies I see and report back with my top five. (We plan to see about thirty movies during the film festival.)
Until July 20…
*****************************************************************
Reading and Watching
Book: The Other Bennet Sister by Janice Hadlow
Television Series: The Other Bennet Sister, adapted by Sarah Quintrell from Janice Hadlow’s novel of the same name
It is a fact universally acknowledged that a good book is usually better than its television adaptation. This is why it is often a mistake to read a book before seeing the series. A series (or a movie) seldom lives up to a reader’s imaginative vision of the story or to the author’s skill in revealing the characters’ inner lives.
Series and movies have their strengths, of course. Acting, dialogue, sound, and cinematography can come together to produce works of art and beauty that can have a profound effect on viewers. But for this reader—a wordy, nerdy woman who has been under the spell of the written word since childhood—books are most always superior to adaptations.
And so it was with The Other Bennet Sister, Janice Hadlow’s sympathetic portrayal of Pride and Prejudice‘s Mary Bennet, the plain and awkward sister plunked among four beautiful sisters. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen’s depiction of Mary Bennet is humorous but unkind, presenting her as a socially inept young woman who always says the wrong thing and can never read the room.
In The Other Bennet Sister, Janice Hadlow allows Mary to have her say, and she skillfully reveals Mary’s inner life—her love of books, her feelings of never fitting in or measuring up to her sisters. Of never being understood. Indeed, of not being loved by her family. I was with Mary all the way, and as she gradually found her footing, I cheered her on. Hadlow charts Mary’s growth in a convincing way. Mary never becomes the belle of the ball, but she does unfold in a way that is lovely to behold and true to Mary’s inner nerdy self.
The series, on the other hand, presents Mary (Ella Bruccoleri) as a clod whose facial expressions are so extreme and odd that, at times, she seems a bit touched. I was not unsympathetic with the character, but as my daughter put it, it was unbelievable that two attractive men would vie for Mary’s attention. In the novel, it was perfectly believable.
In addition, there is a plot change that makes no sense, given the times and the extreme wealth of two of Mary’s sisters. I suppose the change—Mary’s determination to be a tutor—is slipped in to give Mary some agency. This is all well and good, but it is the opposite of the way Mary feels in the book, and in the early 1800s, a family of means would never encourage one of their own to be a tutor.
I did finish the television series, and I didn’t totally dislike it, but the book was so much better.
As is usually the case.
Readers, have any of you both read the book and watched the series? If so, I would love to hear your reactions.













































