All posts by Clif Graves

PEANUT BUTTER HEARTS FOR A SWEET DAY

Last night, my husband, Clif, and I made chocolate peanut butter hearts for a Valentine’s Day bake sale to be held where he works. (Money from the sale goes toward employee events.) Basically, these are peanut butter balls cut in the shape of hearts and dipped in chocolate.

Clif figured out a good way of rolling the sticky dough, which consists of confectioners’ sugar, graham crackers, vanilla, butter, and, of course, peanut butter.  (Click here for a full recipe.) He rolled it right on a cookie sheet, cut out little hearts, and transferred them to another cookie sheet.

I used a bigger cutter for the hearts, and I just pressed out small rounds of dough before cutting the shapes. My method worked, but his was more efficient, and it is what we will do next year if there is another Valentine’s Day bake sale.

After the hearts had been dipped and had hardened, we taste-tested a couple of the smaller hearts, just to be sure they were fit for consumption. We thought they were, and apparently other folks did, too.

This morning, at 8:45, Clif called to tell me that the hearts, both big and small, had sold out. The small hearts went first, and I can see why. In their little paper cups, they were much cuter than the large hearts, plain in their snack-sized Ziplocks.

Big or small, I hope some of those hearts make it home to loved ones—husbands, wives, children, mothers, and fathers.

WARMING UP THE DAY WITH SEE’S CHOCOLATES

A very cold February day in central Maine. With the wind chill, it’s not much above zero outside, and here is the view from my kitchen window.

But lucky me! My husband, Clif, came through yet again. He knows all about my unflagging enthusiasm for See’s Chocolates, which makes chocolates exactly the way I like them: sweet and old-fashioned with nary a hint of bacon, thyme, or red pepper.

What a way to warm up the day!

IN BRIEF: TRANSITION TOWN POTLUCK

Today, I’m making bread and a squash soup to bring to a Transition Town potluck tonight. I love the whole notion of Transition Towns, of communities working together to become more resilient in the face of peak oil and climate change. Local food is a big part of the Transition Town movement as are alternative energy projects, weatherizeation, and community events. We’ll see how Transition Town goes in Winthrop.

Click here to learn more about Transition Town and how it all began “across the pond”:

 

 

ON BEING FAT: PART V—CONTROLLED CHEATING

In my past posts On Being Fat, I have briefly explored our country’s current history of obesity, and I outlined my struggle with being overweight. I covered—again briefly—the ups and downs of will power and the reaction an obese person’s body has to losing weight. Now the time has come for the cherry on the sundae, so to speak, where I write about a diet regime called Controlled Cheating, which was created by a man named Fats Goldberg. I came across this regime in a very roundabout way.

Fourteen years ago, my friend Barbara Johnson and I went to the Brunswick Library’s book sale, which is renowned in central Maine for the high quality of its books. People get there long before the doors open, and first in line are the second-hand booksellers, who snarl at each other as they jockey for position. When the doors open, the crowd stampedes for the books, and woe to anyone who falls in the rush.

Fortunately for me, the section I am drawn to—the pinhead literary section—is not one that attracts the booksellers, and I was able to browse freely without fear of having a book snatched from my hands. Even then, I had long been a fan of the New Yorker, and when I came across Calvin Trillin’s American Stories, into the canvas bag it went.

American Stories is a collection of Calvin Trillin’s essays, and most of them were originally published in the New Yorker. Many of the essays are quite dark, detailing the rather sordid underbelly of American culture. But not all of them focus on “crimes and misdemeanors,” and one of them profiled Larry “Fats” Goldberg, a friend since high school. Trillin jokingly refers to himself as Fats Goldberg’s Boswell, and indeed Trillin seems to get great pleasure from following Fats Goldberg around and recording what this legendary eater could dispatch in a single sitting. (A lot!) But for me, the really interesting thing was not how much Fats Goldberg ate—although I admit I was somewhat in awe of his Falstaffian appetite—but rather how Fats Goldberg managed to stay slim and yet eat so much.

Apparently, it wasn’t always this way with Fats Goldberg. When he was in high school, Goldberg weighed over 300 pounds, and even then he was a legendary eater. When he was a young adult, one day, for no particular reason he can recall, Fats Goldberg decided he had had enough with being fat and decided to lose weight. He devised a system called Controlled Cheating because he noticed that sooner or later, most people cheat on their diets, and when they do, it is a downward spiral until all the weight that has been lost is regained. (How right he is about that!) Fats Goldberg reasoned, if everyone cheats on their diets, why not build it into the system? And this is what he did. Six days a week, Fats Goldberg ate so well that he would have made Alice Waters and Michael Pollan jump for joy. Goldberg’s diet included the usual things people eat when they want to lose weight—fruit, fresh vegetables, lean meat, all in limited amounts. Then, on the seventh day Fats Goldberg would rest, allowing himself to eat anything he wanted and as much as he could hold. These days came to be fondly known as “cheat days.” However, there is a qualifier that must be added: an hour of vigorous exercise every day. No exercise, no cheat day.

Not only did Fats Goldberg managed to shed half his weight with controlled cheating, but he also kept it off for over 40 years until he died at age 69 from complications related to Alzheimer’s disease.

After reading Trillin’s essay, I was impressed with Fat’s Goldberg’s method and success. As an adult, I had had spotty success with dieting, losing weight and then putting it right back on. A few months of dieting wer all I could really manage before I fell off the wagon and began cheating my way back to what I weighed when I started. I had tried all sorts of methods, but never Controlled Cheating. “Why not give it a shot?” I asked myself. “What’s the worst that can happen? You won’t lose weight. Nothing new there.”

So I tried it, and it worked. I lost about 60 pounds and was the thinest I had been in a long time. I biked and walked. My blood pressure was that of an athlete’s, and my blood sugar and cholesterol were equally as good. I was trim, and I felt great. Six days a week I was a virtuous eater, and I allowed myself 1,500 calories a day. Like Fats Goldberg, my noncheat diet consisted mainly of fruit, vegetables, and low-fat protein. My cheat day was Saturday, and it was the day I lived for, planning it in exquisite detail—donuts, fish and chips, chocolate, ice cream sundaes. What a day!

During my noncheat days, whenever I felt myself flagging, I would picture cheat day in all its glories, and I was able to press on with my diet. However, despite the success of this method, it required a lot of mental energy and constant vigilance. On noncheat days, there was never a time when I could just relax and not monitor what I ate. I had to be on guard all the time, and I had to exercise faithfully for an hour every single day. I was hungry most of the time, and I always thought about food.

For two years, the longest I have ever stuck with a diet, I was able to keep the weight off using this method. But, as I mentioned in a previous post, life took an interesting turn. My husband and I began publishing a literary magazine called Wolf Moon Journal, and it had a full-time staff of one—me.  While I enjoyed working on the journal, it sapped both my time and my energy to the point where I could no longer focus so intensively on my diet and exercise. Slowly the weight came back on, until I gained every bit of weight I had lost.

Two years ago, my husband and I stopped publishing the journal. I still write regularly, but my duties are nothing compared to what they were when we were publishing Wolf Moon. Nevertheless, I continued to overeat. Last May, when I went for my physical, I was alarmed to find I had gained 13 pounds over the winter.

The doctor didn’t lecture me, but I lectured myself. “Keep this up, and you’ll be a candidate for the show Heavy.” (Hugely obese people are shipped to a spa where they diet and exercise until they are ready to drop.) Time to return to Controlled Cheating, which I did not long after that May physical. Because I am post menopausal, I’ve had to go to 1,200 a day to lose weight instead of the 1,500 of my younger years.

Since last May, I have lost 45 pounds and feel so much better. I have dropped two sizes and hope to go down another size or two. People tell me how great I look, but it’s hard for me to judge. I look at myself and see a fat person lurking underneath. (Fats Goldberg mentioned a similar phenomenon, and this seems to be quite common for people who have been overweight.) In truth, I think I look relatively “normal,” although by modern American standards I am plump and probably always will be.

But to heck with modern American standards. If I can get down to a size 14, I will be content.

Just as it was when I went on Controlled Cheating for the first time, every noncheat day is a struggle. I am constantly hungry; I’m always thinking about food. Gum is a lifesaver. So is fruit and peppermint tea. And that shining day, cheat day, is always just around the corner, that one day when I can relax and eat whatever I want.

One more day to go.

 

FOOD, GLORIOUS FOOD

Today is the anniversary of the birthday of Charles Dickens, one of the greatest English writers of all times. While his stories can be maddeningly slow—I just finished reading David Copperfield and oh how I chafed at the pace—there can be no denying that Dickens was a brilliant writer who came up with vivid, memorable characters that still have a hold on us today. (Scrooge, Fagin, Tiny Tim, and Uriah Heep come to mind, but there are many others.)

Food, especially the lack thereof, thrums through many of his novels, and this is a good reminder for modern readers that it’s only very recently that food has been so abundant in western countries. In Dickens’s time—early to mid-1800s—poor people were frequently hungry, and in David Copperfield, Dickens writes movingly of young David’s hunger as he tries to buy enough food with his meager salary and doesn’t always succeed. (David is ten years old, virtually abandoned by his cruel stepfather, and is working in a factory.)

However, perhaps the most famous food scene from a Dickens’s novel comes from Oliver Twist, when young Oliver, who lives in a horribly grim workhouse asks, “Please, sir, I want some more.”

What Oliver wants is more gruel, which he, of course doesn’t get.

Here is a snappy version of that scene from the 1968 movie Oliver!

 

My favorite lines? “Food, Glorious food. Don’t care what it looks like. Burnt, underdone, crude. Don’t care what the cook’s like.”

Happy birthday, Mr. Dickens!

 

ON BEING FAT: PART IV—YOUR BODY REALLY DOES WANT TO HANG ONTO THAT FAT

“Nobody wants to be fat. In most modern cultures, even if you are healthy…to be fat is to be perceived as weak-willed and lazy. It’s also just embarrassing.” –Tara Parker-Pope, the New York Times

Over the holidays, I met with a friend who has struggled with her weight for nearly as long as I have. Right now, she is close to her ideal weight, and she has worked hard to get there. As we were talking about weight and dieting, she told me about an article in the New York Times“The Fat Trap” by Tara Parker-Pope. (I started this On Being Fat series by linking to it.) My friend also mentioned how discouraging the article was, but that she was going forward with an optimistic attitude about her own weight, and I said I would be doing the same with mine. (I’ve lost about 45 pounds since May.)

This is exactly what we should do, but let’s face it, the odds aren’t in our favor. My friend and I both have a long history of losing weight and then gaining it all back, and we aren’t alone in our struggle with fat. According to MSNBC, “more than 80 percent of people who have lost weight regain all of it, or more, after two years.” My own patterns of gaining and losing certainly verify this, and the same is true for many people I know.

Why should so many of us who really and truly want to be trim gain weight back after losing it? Parker-Pope provides some answers in “The Fat Trap.”  In brief, studies indicate that genetics and hormones make it difficult for many people to lose large amounts of weight permanently. It seems our bodies don’t like shedding pounds, and when an obese person loses weight, his or her body pumps out a hormone called ghrelin, which stimulates the appetite. At the same time, the dieting body will produce less of peptide YY and leptin, which suppress appetite.  “A cocktail of other hormones associated with hunger and metabolism all remained significantly changed compared to pre-dieting levels.”

Parker-Pope notes: “For years, the advice to the overweight and obese has been that we simply need to eat less and exercise more. While there is truth to this guidance, it fails to take into account that the human body continues to fight against weight loss long after dieting has stopped.”

She movingly recounts how her mother struggled with being overweight, and how, as her mother lay dying, “[i]t was her great regret that in the days before she died, the closest medical school turned down her offer to donate her body because she was obese.” In turn, Parker-Pope struggles with her own weight, and by her own admission, she is at least 60 pounds overweight.

Parker-Pope then goes on to describe some people—the happy few—who have indeed managed to keep their weight down for many years. Readers, I have bad news that will come as no surprise to those of you who have a history of dieting. It takes constant vigilance and will power for a formerly obese person to maintain a healthy weight. Such people can never not think about food, how much they have eaten and how much they will eat. It also requires exercise—at least an hour a day, seven days a week.

Is it any wonder people just give up? I have done so many times in the past when I have just plain gotten tired of always monitoring every bit of food that has gone into my mouth.

However, I do have some good news. I have found a system that has made losing weight and keeping it off a little easier. (Not easy, mind you. Just easier.) I stumbled across it by accident fourteen years ago, and I had more success with this method of losing weight than I have ever had with any other system. Unfortunately, after keeping off the weight for two years, I gained it back, and the reason is fairly simple. My husband and I started a small literary magazine called Wolf Moon Journal, which occupied so much of my day that I couldn’t focus on keeping track of everything I ate, and I no longer had time to exercise.

Two years ago, we stopped publishing the journal. Over a year ago, I was diagnosed with breast cancer and was told not to diet during radiation treatment, and it was open season on chocolate and sweets, my weaknesses. Last May, after radiation treatment was over, I went for my yearly exam, and I found I had gained 13 pounds over the winter. I was at my heaviest. Yikes!

The time had come to take another shot at losing weight, to return to the system that had worked so well for me 14 years ago. That system is called controlled cheating, and in my final post On Being Fat, I’ll describe the system and the roundabout way I came across it.

MAPLE SYRUP SEASON APPROACHES!

Today, I should be writing the next installment in my series On Being Fat. (I promise that the next installment will be coming soon.) Instead, I’m going to write about maple syrup. I just can’t help myself. I am so keen on maple syrup that even the merest hint that the season is about to begin sends me into a fever of anticipation. I love the whole process—the tapping of the trees, the boiling of the sap, the great wood fires, the steam, and finally, the glorious substance itself—maple syrup, which can also be made into sugar or a soft spread to be used on toast. (My mouth is watering as I write this.)

I’m not the only one who loves maple syrup. There are a couple of sugar shacks in the area, and when the season is in full swing, those shacks are packed on weekends.

As it happens, there is a sugar shack—Mike’s Maple House—not far from our house, probably not more than three miles away. Yesterday, as I was taking the dog for a walk, I saw a man hauling logs out of the woods, and they came from a dead tree he had just cut up. It was Mike Smith, owner of Mike’s Maple House, and his face was very red from the exertion of pulling the logs with tongs through the snow.

Naturally, I stopped to talk with him. “That’s a lot of work.”

“It is,” he said, wiping his sweating face. “But I’m about done and am ready to throw the wood into my truck.”

I nodded, seeing the truck parked a little ways down the road. “Looks like pretty good wood.”

“Yup,” he replied.  “Three weeks in a shed or a barn, and it will be ready to burn. I don’t dare leave it here until tomorrow. I’m afraid someone will take it.”

“I can see your point. Do you use it to heat your house?”

“No, this is for making maple syrup.”

Ah, maple syrup! Beside me, the dog sat down and resigned himself to waiting until the conversation was over and the walk would resume.

Mike continued, “The season’s coming right up. Hope it’s as good this year as it was last year. I actually ran out of wood to boil the sap. But who knows how it will be? It’s been such a weird fall and winter.”

Yes, it has.

Then Mike went on to tell me a couple of maple syrup stories. “One year, someone drove by, saw flames shooting into the sky from my sugar house, and called the fire department. Must have been somebody new to the area who didn’t know me. When the fire department came, they told me they figured it was just me. You should have called me first, I told them, before coming out here.”

Indeed they should have.

“Lots of new people on this road and a lot more traffic, too. When I first moved here, I could let my children take oxen down the road to haul wood out of the forest. Wouldn’t do that today. Too much traffic.”

He is certainly right about that. The dog and I have to constantly watch for oncoming cars, and occasionally, we even have to stop and move over if one seems to be coming too fast and too close.

“Well,” I said, “I’d best be on my way. But I’ll be seeing you soon. In the next month or so?”

“I hope so,” Mike said.

The dog and I continued our walk. The sky, which had been gray when we started out, began to clear, the cloud cover rolling back like a receding tide, leaving blue sky in its wake rather than a sandy beach. A dusting of snow covered the evergreens and the bare branches of the trees, and as the sun emerged, the branches glittered and sparkled.

“It looks like a fairyland,” I fancifully told myself.

But thoughts of maple syrup quickly returned to replace thoughts of fairyland. On my way back, I saw that Mike had loaded the wood into his truck, and he waved to me as he went by. I waved back. Maple syrup season is almost here. And I can’t wait.

 

 

 

 

TALKING ABOUT SOUP AND ANNATTO WITH ROSA AT THE FLAKY TART

Yesterday was a gray winter day, raw with spitting snow and slippery underfoot. My friend Claire picked me up late morning for lunch at The Flaky Tart in downtown Winthrop, and as I walked to her car, I slipped in my own driveway. Fortunately, I did not fall, but it made me extra careful. (Later that day, when I took the dog for a walk, I was sure to wear my grippers.)

As regular readers know, The Flaky Tart is new in town, and with its good food and warm, snappy decor, it has become one of Winthrop’s hot spots. Claire and I meet there once a week or so, and I always look forward to our outings. Often, we see people that we know, and the two owners, Kim and Rosa, are so friendly that they make the Tart even more inviting.

Rosa, who was on duty yesterday, does much of the cooking. Not long ago I had had one of Rosa’s bean soups, which was delicious. Kim happened to be working that day, and I asked her about the spicing. “Cumin,” she answered. “And a bit of allspice.”

Allspice! I had never used this in soup but after tasting Rosa’s, I decided to try it in some of my own soups. So far, I have had great success with it in two soups—a sausage, bean soup and a creamy, curried tomato soup with chickpeas and roasted cauliflower. (A recipe for the latter will be forthcoming. I still need to tinker with it a bit and to record the exact amounts of what I used.)

But back to yesterday. After lunch, I chatted with Rosa and told her how her soup had inspired me to branch out with my own. I described the creamy, curried tomato soup and mentioned that while it was perfectly good with just the curry, it seemed somewhat flat. When I added the allspice—and some coriander—the add spices seemed to give the soup that little something extra.

“Yes,” Rosa said. “The spices gave it another dimension.”

Rosa, who is from Venezuela, described what she asks for when she goes back home for a visit.

“Not Italian shoes,” she said with a laugh. “Instead I want spices and good cocoa.”

“Good decision!” I agreed.

Rosa then went to to tell me about one of her favorite spices—the annatto seed—which gives food a bright color similar to saffron. “When you sizzle it in oil it is so beautiful, and it has a spicy but not hot taste.”

“Where you can get it around here?” I asked.

“Whole Foods, I think, and maybe Harvest Time in Augusta.”

This morning, I Googled annatto and found a description of it in the blog the epicenter: “slightly sweet and peppery.” There are also some very good instruction on how to use annatto—in hot liquids (soups!) as well as in hot oil. Apparently, the seeds jump in hot oil, so keep the pan covered.

Lately, I have become quite the dedicated soup maker. They are economical, and they warm the soul as well as the body. In the past, I have wondered if soups were too humble and common to serve guests, but my friends seem to love being invited over for a soup night. (And bread, too, if I don’t broil it.) I must also admit that soup meshes well with my improvisational style of cooking.

At any rate, although I am somewhat obsessed with the Tart’s bacon and egg sandwiches on homemade bread, I have decided that from now on I will always try the soup of the day. Rosa has already taught me some new tricks about soup, and I expect there is much more to learn.

 

 

 

 

BROILED BREAD

On Sunday, we invited our friends Jim and Dawna Leavitt over for one of our simple suppers of soup, bread, and salad. In the freezer, I had a turkey carcass leftover from Thanksgiving, which would be the base of a soup that would also include potatoes, carrots, and additional meat from roasted chicken thighs. The carcass was huge so I made a lot of stock—this meant we had plenty of soup for our supper as well as enough to send some home with Dawna and Jim.

I also made bread. In December, our old stand mixer stopped working, and we ordered a new one from Westinghouse. The old stand mixer was not a very good one—it didn’t have much power—but I had learned how to make good bread with it. The new stand mixer is much better, but my technique has had to change. In addition, since it is more powerful, I have changed recipes so that my loaves are bigger. (I now use the recipe from King Arthur’s Flour.) As a result, it has taken me a couple of months to adapt to the new mixer and to make decent bread with it. Funny yet instructive to think of how someone who has made over 100 loaves of bread last year would have a learning curve with a new mixer, but that’s the way it worked.

After two months of using the new stand mixer and getting used to the King Arthur recipe, I have pretty much gotten it down, and yesterday’s dough came out especially well, moist and perfectly spongy and rising just the way it ought to. I had high hopes for that bread.

Sunday ticked by as my husband, Clif, and I got ready for Jim and Dawna. By 4:30, the soup was all done and simmering on the stove. It had been deemed “Not bad,” by Clif, which in his Yankee parlance is high praise. All the components of the salad were prepared so that putting it together at the last minute would be easy, and I had timed the making of the bread so that it would be baking while we all had wine and cheese and crackers.

The Leavitts came over, and as soon as they were settled in the living room with their wine, I preheated the oven, put in the bread, set the timer for 30 minutes, and went to join the others in the living room. When the timer went off, I checked the bread, and to my horror I saw that the tops were burnt.

“What’s up with the oven?” I said to myself, trying not panic as I removed the bread from the oven.

I popped one of the loaves out of the pan, flipped it over, and it proceeded to sink lower than chapati. As it turned out, the top might have been burnt but the bottom was underdone. I popped the other one out but left it upside down. It did not sink—not right off anyway—but its bottom was as underdone as the first, and I did not have a good feeling about it.

What could be wrong with that oven?, I asked myself again, and I begin fiddling with the temperature dial to see if somehow it was out of whack. It wasn’t. Then I looked at the dial where you select bake, except it wasn’t on bake. It was on broil, and sure enough, when I opened the oven I could feel the heat coming from above rather than below. (Now, why hadn’t I noticed that error when I put the bread in to bake? The simple answer is that I just wasn’t paying attention.)

For five minutes, I tried baking the second loaf that hadn’t fallen, but the damage was done, and it, too, fell. I had to face facts—I would not be serving that bread with supper. What to do? Soup without some kind of bread just didn’t seem right to me. Luckily, the solution came quickly—ordinarily I am not a quick thinker—and that solution was biscuits.

I explained the bread situation to Clif, Jim, and Dawna, and the Leavitts were their usual gracious selves. “Oh, don’t make biscuits. We’re fine with just soup.”

Nevertheless, I made biscuits, and they came out exactly the way they should—light and fluffy and perfectly cooked. (And I managed not to broil them.)

As we sat down to eat, I thought about the broiled bread disaster. I had never done such a thing before, and I hope I will never do it again, that’s for sure. Yet, in a way, I was lucky our guests were Jim and Dawna. We’ve been friends for so long—nearly 30 years—and we are so comfortable with each other that the bread debacle was less of a horror with them than it would have been with guests we hadn’t known as long.

How wonderful to have such friends! But next time they come over, I’ll be especially careful not to broil the bread.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JANUARY 27, 2012: BITS AND BOBS FROM THE INTERNET

From Bloomerg: A piece about food waste worldwide. It includes this sobering statistic: “The FAO has said global food output must rise 70 percent by 2050 to feed a world population expected to grow to 9 billion from 7 billion.” Food not wasted would go a long way toward achieving this goal.

From the New York Times: A look at Mormons and food, specifically, their desire to feed people. Mormon households are encouraged to set aside three months’ to a years’ worth of food. Very interesting, and leaving aside the green Jello and other powdered foods, there are some good tips in this piece.

From the Portland Press Herald: A short but cogent article by Anne Mahle about the importance of serving “honest” food to children. That is, not hiding the fact that you’re, say, serving vegetables. Just serve the vegetables. Mahle suggests that dishonest, sneaky approaches do the child no favor. I agree.

From National Geographic: Popcorn, that snack of snacks, was eaten 6,000 years ago in Peru. I wonder, is there any other modern snack, other than fruit, that has been around as long?

From the blog Henbogle: As Ali has put it, the climes they are a-changing. The USDA has released a new climate zone map, which shows that the Northeast is a half a zone warmer than it was when the previous map came out in 1990. I know. A half a zone doesn’t sound like much, but it has real implications—some good and some bad—for farmers and gardeners.